GHANA’S DEMOCRACY; A GULVANIZED DICTATORSHIP
Over the years many have painted
Ghana’s democracy with flamboyant colors. BBC report describes Ghana has
“genuine democracy where people are aware of their rights and actively tried to
find out what their politicians are up to”. The international community has
often lauded Ghana as a beacon of peace and stability as if that is not enough
the U.S. president Barack Obama called Ghana a "model for democracy"
in Africa.
One this score l asks what kind of spectacles does these international bodies wears to assess Ghana’s democracy. This quickly reminds me of what Ghana’s veteran journalist, the late Komla Dumor says no foreigner can tell the true story of African. In this light, I say it unequivocally that, Ghana’s democracy is a galvanized autocracy.One will wonder to ask, what l mean by GHANA’S DEMOCRACY; A GALVANIZED AUTHOCRACY. This means that, Ghana has all the features and structures of a democratic state but practice autocracy. The presence of the JUDICIARY, LEGISLATURE, ELECTORIAL COMMISSION and some democratic institutions are just window dressing in Ghana’s democracy. These democratic institutions are toothless bulldog since the Executive or Presidency has massive control on these bodies, making it cumbersome for these institutions to perform their role ringer apogee.
To begin with, a look at the work
relationship between the EXECUTIVE and the LEGISLATURE, the constitution
provides the avenue for checks and balance between these bodies (Article 106 of the 1992 constitution).
Unfortunately, article 78(1) gives the president the mandate to establish his
executive from the parliament. This means that, the president will choose his
ministers among members of his political party who are also members of parliament.
As if that is not enough, Article 111 of the Constitution says that the Vice
President and those of the President’s ministers who are not elected members of
parliament shall be entitled to participate in the proceedings of parliament
with all the rights and privileges of a member of parliament, except voting.
What this means is that, the minority caucus will be made powerless hence the
mantra “Minority will have their say but the Majority will have their way”.
The presidents' greedy penchant for
dominancy does not spare the JUDICIARY. Article
125 of the constitution postulates that justice
emanates from the people and shall be administered in the name of the Republic
by the Judiciary which shall be independent and subject only to this
constitution. But it seems with Ghana’s democratic dispensation, successive
ruling government suspends this section of the constitution. For instance the constitution
mandates CHRAJ to investigate allegations of corruption and human rights
violations. Unfortunately, after CHARJ conducting these investigations, she
reports to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General, whose head is
politically appointed by the government in power. This means that the ruling
government can comfortably ignore the investigation done by CHRAJ when it
implicates the ruling government. The woes of CHRAJ gets worse, as CHRAJ does
not have any avenue of funding than to rely on the annual budget from the
Ministry of Finance, whose head his politically appointed by the ruling government?
This is gives the platform for members of the party in power to engage
themselves in corruption with impudence after all their government is in
power and the constitution has amass lot
of power in therefore, they are untouchable and such practice these not defines
a democratic state.
What is more, despite the
constitutional guarantee for independent judiciary, Contrary the same
constitution gives the President the power to appoint the Chief Justice and
other Judges of the superior court either in consultation with the Council of State or the Judicial Council. But the sad news is
that members in both consultative bodies gets their appointment from the ruling
President. This brings to play the principle of “I SCRATCH YOUR BACK, YOUR SCRACTH MINE”.
In addition to the above, the electoral commission likewise the Judiciary also faces the same challenges. The Chairman for the electoral commission is not elected through universal adult suffrage but he/she get appointments from the ruling President, besides the electoral commission rely on the same ruling President for her annual budget. This makes the electoral commission liable for manipulation and questions the impartiality of the electoral commission.
In addition to the above, the electoral commission likewise the Judiciary also faces the same challenges. The Chairman for the electoral commission is not elected through universal adult suffrage but he/she get appointments from the ruling President, besides the electoral commission rely on the same ruling President for her annual budget. This makes the electoral commission liable for manipulation and questions the impartiality of the electoral commission.
Democracy is when the wish of the people and all democratic institutions are being put onto account in the process of administering the state. Democracy will make true meaning when it is the kind of governance that advertises true people power and not the concentration of power in the hands of the ruling President, this provides recipe for dictatorship.
Comments
Post a Comment